Monday, June 4, 2007
The OxyContin Letters
When things go wrong, don’t walk away.
That will only make it harder.
-Robin Lane and the Chartbusters
I recently wrote about how the makers of OxyContin agreed to a wimpy $600 million settlement with the federal government. Purdue Pharma, the makers of OxyContin, were selling an addictive drug. The top executives knew it was addictive, and the company sold almost $10 billion of the stuff.
Their lawyer, presidential candidate Rudolph Giuliani, negotiated a plea that kept people at Purdue from going to jail.
Giuliani cut a deal that street pushers would drool over. The fine is a small percentage of their sales, and the drug is still on the market.
In the language of the street pusher, the people at Purdue coped a plea, paid a fine and went back on the street.
In the wake of the OxyContin executives’ admission to committing a CRIME, Congressmen Hal Rogers of Kentucky and Frank Wolff of Virginia made a reasonable request.
They want OxyContin to be prescribed only for severe pain, not moderate pain as it is now.
Rogers said that one of the advantages of the change would be that it would cut the number of drugs being diverted to the black market.
Rogers and Wolff asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to look into the matter.
Amazingly, Purdue Pharma, the makers of OxyContin, the same company that just let Giuliani cop a plea on their behalf, are fighting Rogers and Wolff.
Instead of thanking God for Rudy’s great connections and the laptop tendencies of the prosecution, the people at Purdue want the FDA to ignore the congressmen.
Here is something I can’t ignore. After I wrote my column, I started hearing from people all over the world.
A reader in Texas wrote the following:
My sister was very much addicted to Oxycontin that she was obtaining legally from her doctor. She was living with my 72-year-old mother as she was unable to hold a job. Her boyfriend was also addicted to various drugs. One night she refused to give him more of her Oxycontin, and he left to later return and cut the throats of my mother and sister.
The OxyContin problem is not confined to the United States. A reader in Canada wrote:
My son was addicted to Oxycontin for about 3 years. He is 22 months clean now but only because he is on the methadone maintenance program. We live in a small town and have to travel 2 hours each way weekly for him to be urine tested and to see the doctor. He was hooked so hard core, it is amazing he is still alive. He is clean right now, but he is a totally different person, often filled with anger. In our town of 6,500 people the drug of choice among our kids is Oxycontin!
Not everyone liked my column. A financial consultant in New York City called me a jerk but didn’t specify why. Either he likes OxyContin or likes Giuliani. Maybe both.
An Arizona reader told me his doctor had prescribed OxyContin for his back pain but that he was careful to explain that the drug could be addictive. Thus, the man used OxyContin without incident.
After reading horror story after horror story, I can’t imagine a scenario where I would willingly take OxyContin. I can understand doing so if you and your doctor weigh the risks and the benefits.
For moderate pain there has to be a better solution than OxyContin. Even if the government just limited the supply, it would be a big step forward.
It takes a lot of gall to keep fighting after your company and its top executives have agreed to a $634.5 million fine—not to mention the fact that everyone who was charged was well-connected enough to avoid serving jail time.
Purdue apparently has that kind of gall.
The people at Purdue admitted to willfully doing something that harmed people. They ought to do more than pay a fine; they ought to show leadership and clean up some of the mess they started.
Instead, they want the FDA’s blessing to keep on selling OxyContin to people with moderate pain.
The people at Purdue need to realize that when things go wrong, you don’t walk away.
That will only make it harder.
Don McNay is the Chairman of the Board for McNay Settlement Group in Richmond, Ky. You can write to him at don@donmcnay.com or read other things he has written at www.donmcnay.com. His newspaper column is syndicated in over 200 newspapers.
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Al Smith Retiring from Comment on Kentucky
| |||||||||
|
|
Peter Lynch's Fidelity Investments Fined $400,000 for Misleading Troops.
Peter Lynch's Fidelity Investments Fined $400,000 for Misleading Troops.
There's gonna be Hell,
When you hear mother freedom start ringing her bell.
It's gonna feel like the whole wide world is raining down on you...
Brought to you courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue."
-Toby Keith
In August, 2004, I wrote a column entitled "Save Our Soldiers from Peter Lynch".
It followed up on an award-winning New York Times series written by Diana Henriques. I wrote several columns about Mr. Lynch and Fidelity Investment, the company where he serves as vice chairman.
Fidelity was peddling an archaic style of mutual fund to military people called contractual mutual funds.
A contractual mutual fund is a terrible deal. Congress outlawed it last year. If Lynch and Fidelity had truly thought that contractual funds were great, they would have made Lynch's famous Magellan Fund contractual. They did not.
Military people have often been prey for questionable financial operators such as payday lenders. The reason is thatsoldiers are often young and financially inexperienced but still make decent money.
I'll be willing to bet that Peter Lynch does not have his money in a contractual fund nor do his Hollywood pals like Lily Tomlin. Fidelity only pushed the stuff on military people.
In 2004, I asked people to stand up for our soldiers and write to everyone they could about the problem. Many groups that support the military did the same.
Finally, The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), a group with real clout, listened.
The NASD reached a settlement with Fidelity Investments Institutional Services. Fidelity agreed to pay $400,000 to settle a complaint accusing them of producing misleading sales materials for the Fidelity Destiny I and Fidelity Destiny II contractual mutual funds.
Fidelity will not admit any wrongdoing, but the sales literature that they gave to soldiers fail to mention the 50% sales charge that soldiers were to pay on the funds.
A pretty big OOPS. A fund doesn't look so good when you take 50% off the top.
Fidelity sold a lot of product to soldiers through First Command Financial Services, a company whichpaid $12 million to settle regulatory charges stating it mislead soldiers about the fees and performance of the contractual plans First Command was peddling.
Even though $400,000 is chump change to a guy like Peter Lynch and a billion-dollar company like Fidelity, the settlement is a black mark on their record.
I have offered a challenge several times to Peter Lynch: if he is unable to prove that a soldier could make a good return with a Fidelity contractual fund, he should go to Iraq and take the place of the soldier owning the fund.
Lynch is still in Boston, and soldiers with his contractual funds are still in Iraq. Since Congress banned sales of the funds, future sales are no longer a concern. Current contractual funds, however, remain in place. The NASD will use the $400,000 to help military people make informed financial decisions.
People ask why I single out Mr. Lynch. At the time when contractual funds were being peddled to soldiers, Lynch was using his "Mr. Clean" image to do television commercials for Fidelity with his Hollywood chums Lily Tomlin and Don Rickles.
Lynch and Fidelity can't have it both ways: they can't use the stellar returns that Lynch achieved (many years ago) with his Magellan fund to attract high-end customers while selling garbage to soldiers.
It is like a fundamentalist church with a strip club and casino in the basement.
I'm hoping that the fine cost Lynch and Fidelity a lot more than the $400,000 that they forked over.
Even if manyAmericans have opposed the Iraq war, they have universally supported the people who have fought and died in it. Military people do their job with more honor and courage than I will ever have.
It's why I get angry when financial companies take advantage of them.
The $400,000 settlement has gotten little notice in the media, but I hope that changes.
When Americans find out that Peter Lynch and his Fidelity Company were not playing straight with soldiers, I hope there will be hell. I hope Americans make the leaders at Fidelity feel like the whole world is raining down on them.
Brought to you courtesy, of the Red, White and Blue.
Don McNay is the author of the Unbridled World of Ernie Fletcher. You can write to him at don@donmcnay.com or read other things that he has written at www.donmcnay.com. His award-winning column is syndicated to over 200 newspapers.

August 2004: Save Our Soldiers from Peter Lynch
August 2004: Sending a Message to Peter Lynch
August 2004: Detailed Information about Fidelity & Contractual Mutual Funds
January 2005: Stop Scamming Brave Soldiers
January 2006: Wall Street Bookies
October 2006: Payday Loans, Soldiers & Donations to Congressmen

Fidelity Fined for Misleading Troops
Motley Fool: A Dishonorable Discharge for Systematic Investment Plans
Saturday, May 19, 2007
Rudolph Giuliani and the OxyContin people
Rudolph Giuliani and the OxyContin people
Well, now if I were the President of this land
You know, I’d declare total war on the pusher man.
God damn the pusher.
Steppenwolf
Rudolph Giuliani wants to be President of the
In some cases, he is—unless the criminals hire him to be their lawyer.
The people who make OxyContin did something horrible: they sold a drug they knew was addictive and acted like it wasn’t.
I thought the makers of OxyContin got off easy when they agreed to a $600 million fine. Three of their top executives paid an additional $34 million. No jail time.
It was an wimpy settlement with a company that sold over $9 billion dollars of OxyContin.
The reason for the government’s light tough was found in the Washington Post. Rudolph Giuliani was a lawyer for the company that makes OxyContin.
>The Post said that Giuliani personally met with government lawyers more than half a dozen times.
>The story gets more outrageous if you read the “The Blotter” blog by Brian Ross of ABC News. Ross said that Giuliani and his team have advised OxyContin’s makers for the past five years.
No wonder the OxyContin people got a sweetheart deal: Giuliani is not a guy government bureaucrats want to mess with.
That means you are sitting across the table from a guy who might be your boss.
If a frontrunner for President of the
The OxyContin makers may not have strong morals, but they do have brains. They hired one of the best lawyers money could buy.
The irony is that the old Rudolph Giuliani would have loved to have gone after the OxyContin makers. Rudy got his start as a federal prosecutor and liked to go after white-collar types.
Here was the perfect situation for the old Rudy. You had a company that knew their drug would make people addicts. The company officers devised a plan to market OxyContin to as many people as possible.
The old Rudy would have shut down the company and thrown all the officers in jail.
The new Rudy cut his clients a sweet deal: no one will spend a day in jail. The federal government considered the crime to be a misdemeanor like noodling. Prosecutors are beating their chest about a $600 million fine that is only about 6% of OxyContin total sales.
$600 million is just a cost of doing business. It won’t even hurt the company’s stock price.
$130 million was set aside for the claims of victims. That sounds incredibly low. Everyone who went to the doctor for a bad back and came out a drug addict has a claim. There are thousands of people addicted to OxyContin, and hundreds died.
When you see round ups of street dealers, many are addicts trying to feed their addiction. Many of those addictions wouldn’t have happened if Giuliani’s clients had not been greedy, reckless and stupid.
A better punishment would be to make the company execs take their own product for a couple months and then kick the habit in a county jail cell.
It would give them an idea of what really happened.
The Steppenwolf song “The Pusher” is a graphic depiction of someone addicted. The character wants the President of the
Giuliani is not the President to make that happen.
When the OxyContin people go to meet their maker, I hope that the response they get is, “God damn the pusher.” It would make up for the government letting them off the hook.
Don McNay is the author of the Unbridled World of Ernie Fletcher. You can write to him at don@donmcnay.com or read other things he has written at www.donmcnay.com. His award-winning column is syndicated on the CNHI News Service.
Saturday, May 12, 2007
Unbridled Typos
Tax Dollars for Flunkies
Tax Dollars for Flunkies
Friday, April 27, 2007
Former Fat Guy for President
My politics are probably closer to
Don’s Get Fit Guys meet every Tuesday at