Saturday, August 11, 2007

Frank Haddad: The Man to See

Frank Haddad: The Man to See

Frank, who was definitely "the man to see" for people in trouble, will be profiled in my upcoming book.

"Send Lawyers, Guns and Money, and get me out of this"
-Warren Zevon

Some well-funded Washington lobbyists are airing a media attack on trial lawyers.

Many people hate lawyers until they need one. As Thomas Wolfe said in The Bonfires of the Vanities, "A liberal is a conservative who has been arrested."

Trial lawyers deal with people who have big problems. There are some people with troubles that lawyers, guns and money cannot help.

Kentucky's greatest criminal attorney, Frank Haddad Jr., once declined a potential client, saying, "He doesn't need a lawyer; he needs a hacksaw."

There were not many people too hopeless for Frank Haddad. People in serious legal trouble often found their way into Frank's Louisville office.

A biography of Washington trial lawyer Edward Bennett Williams was entitled The Man to See. In Kentucky, the man to see was definitely Frank Haddad.

Frank was a friend of mine, but he had thousands of other friends too. His funeral in 1995 was one of the largest in Kentucky's history. He grew up poor, but when he died he was a multi-millionaire who had never forgotten his roots.

Frank was humble but not afraid of anything. He was quick-witted with a magnetic personality.

He had a great sense of who he was. I once called him on a trivial matter telling him that I needed his help. His immediate response was, "Don, you must really be in trouble if you need my help."

He was even liked by the prosecutors he battled in court. His sense of humor helped his clients. A federal prosecutor told me that once when Frank represented a reputed pornographer, he brought boxes of popcorn and candy for the prosecutor to eat as they watched the movies in evidence. The prosecutor admitted that Frank's funny gesture lightened the tension of the plea negotiations.

Frank had a personality that commanded respect. I frequently had lunch with Gary Hillerich, who practiced law with Frank, and occasionally Frank would join us. Once we wanted to go to a popular restaurant and heard there was an hour wait for a table.

Frank picked up the phone and said, "This is Frank Haddad, and I will be there in five minutes." Five minutes later, we walked in and were immediately taken to a table large enough for 8 people.

When my dad would enter a crowded restaurant, one of my father's friends jokingly would yell, "Someone had better get up, Joe's here."

I told dad that when Frank Haddad wanted a table, someone really did have to get up.

Frank was loyal to his friends both rich and poor. He surrounded himself with a number of talented lawyers, including his brother Robert Haddad. They did more free legal work than anyone I have ever met.

It would not be unusual to see a famous politician or millionaire sitting patiently in the law firm's lobby while the firm was doing pro bono work for a janitor or someone from Frank's old neighborhood.

He had the perfect voice to be a lawyer. It was a booming voice that could both command a courtroom and calm a nervous client. People who call criminal lawyers, or any kind of trial lawyer, are scared and want immediate help. Frank had a voice that gave people confidence in his ability to solve their problems and he usually could.

If Frank could not help them, they probably did need a hacksaw.

The Kentucky Academy of Trial Attorneys (KATA) gives an award for great lifetime achievements. The award is named for Peter Perlman, the only Kentuckian to be named president of the American Trial Lawyers Association.

At the presentation of the first Perlman award, I was sitting at Frank's table when KATA President Bill Garmer started reading the biography of the man selected as the first honoree.

About halfway through the presentation, Frank realized that Bill was talking about him and began to cry. Frank then got up and accepted the award with the humility, humor and the commanding presence that he always had.

I have always thought that Frank's life story would make a terrific biography. If trial lawyers circulated Frank's compelling life story, it would go a long way in responding to the media's attacks on them.

Frank was a role model that average citizens could admire and other lawyers should emulate.

I have worked with hundreds of lawyers but none quite like Frank.
He was definitely "the man to see."

The following is an incredible profile of Frank Haddad that was written by Bob Hill and published in the Courier-Journal Magazine. I hate that it does not have the wonderful pictures but Bob Hill did a terrific job of capturing Frank's personality.

Courier-Journal Profile of Frank Haddad

Story Behind the Song

Lawyers, Guns and Money

Warren Zevon is one of my most frequently quoted artists and one that has an incredibly hard core following. He was one of the great songwriters of his generation and quite a character.

His ex wife wrote a recent biography of him, I'll Sleep When I Am Dead: The Dirty Life and Times of Warren Zevon. Although it is filled with the angst of her being married to a less than model citizen, it is a fascinating glimpse of his life, the people who crossed through it and the music business.

It is worth reading, although I would have preferred a more impartial source. I really do not want my ex-wife to write a biography of me, although we apparently get along a whole lot better than Warren and his ex did.

Warren was an Excitable Boy in the literal sense. I just write about excitable boys; a subtle but distinct difference in our personalities.

The Poll

The following are the results from last week's poll:

Do you buy lottery tickets?

47.1% - Sometimes
35.3% - No
17.6% - Regularly

Would you hold a news conference if you won the Powerball lottery?

100% of respondents said No!

This week there are two poll questions:

Which Democrat would you like to see as the nominee for President?

Which Republican would you like to see as the nominee for President?

To vote in this week's poll follow the link below. The poll will be on the left hand side of the web page.

Weekly Poll

Don McNay is Chairman of the Board for McNay Settlement Group in Richmond, Ky. You can write to him at don@donmcnay.com or read other things he has written at http://www.donmcnay.com/. His book, Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers and What to Do When You Win the Lottery, will be released later this year.

Income Annuities



McNay on Money




Mark Walstrom, a structured settlement consultant in Arizona, runs an excellent blog and pointed readers to a Wall Street Journal article that I found interesting.

I have been a big fan of income annuities for 25 years but they are just starting to catch on with the general public.

The Case for 'Income Annuities'

By JEFF D. OPDYKE August 8, 2007; Page D3

Strategies outlined in a new study could sharply lengthen the amount of time a nest egg survives in retirement.

The study, soon to be released by the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton Financial Institutions Center, finds that so-called income annuities can assure retirees of an income stream for life at a cost as much as 40% less than a traditional stock, bond and cash mix. The study was co-sponsored by New York Life Insurance Co., which sells annuities.

Income annuities are insurance contracts designed to pay back not only a return on investment, but also a portion of the original principal with each payment. The payout occurs over your life expectancy, but if you live longer, you continue to receive payments. Those who die earlier than their life expectancy effectively subsidize those who live longer.

What it means is that retirees who need a nest egg of, say, $1 million, can live the same lifestyle with as little as $600,000 in an income annuity. Looked at another way, $1 million in an annuity will currently generate about $86,000 a year in income for a healthy 65-year-old male, while the same amount invested in a traditional securities portfolio would currently generate between $40,000 and $50,000 annually, depending on the annual withdrawal rate.

That news could offer hope for the millions of workers about to retire with inadequate retirement savings.

"At 65 years old, you're going to need money, on average, until you're 85," says David F. Babbel, an insurance and risk-management professor at the Wharton School who co-wrote the paper with Craig B. Merrill, an insurance and finance professor at Brigham Young University. "But the problem is that 'on average' means half of the people will need continuing income between the ages of 86 and maybe past 100. That's where [retirement-income planning] breaks down."

To ensure that you have a stream of income that lasts for as long as you breathe generally requires an inordinately large beginning value -- and even then, there is no guarantee your account won't run dry, depending upon your ultimate spending needs in retirement.

An income annuity is the only asset class the two professors found that most effectively addresses the risk of outliving your nest egg, because it generates a permanent stream of income, unlike a typical nest egg of stocks, bonds and cash. Meanwhile, the study notes, investors who place retirement wealth in mutual funds "are subjected to greater risk, typically higher expenses, and returns that are unlikely to keep pace with annuity returns, when investment risk is taken into account."

Yet the study also found that consumers have been tepid buyers of income annuities to this point. Many worry about costs, illiquidity in a financial emergency and the bad reputation the industry as a whole is often saddled with because of well-chronicled and dubious sales tactics with some variable annuities.

Prof. Babbel says the insurance industry is addressing these issues by building new contracts that are inexpensive, allow access to cash and don't have the problems associated with other types of annuities. The best strategy, Prof. Babbel says, is to invest enough in an annuity early in retirement to cover basic fixed costs. That allows you to invest the remainder of your portfolio more aggressively.